Monday, December 14, 2015

THE QUESTION OF JERUSALEM





THE QUESTION OF JERUSALEM

Seeking God’s mercy upon our nation

Printer-friendly versionSend by email


Jerusalem a Settlement?

The Obama administration’s demands in 2009 that east Jerusalem be included in a total freeze on Jewish settlement activity has brought to the fore once again the very issue upon which the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem was founded the unity of Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was genuinely caught off guard in May of that year when US President Barack Obama began openly insisting on a complete halt to all Jewish building in the disputed territories. The Netanyahu government was trying to work out a deal to allow some continued growth in the settlements when the US State Department then made clear they expected this construction ban to also extend to east Jerusalem.
To be fair, this is not the first American administration to issue twisted directives on Jerusalem. US policy on Jerusalem has long been legally absurd. The astonishing fact is that Washington has never recognised any part of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. State Department officials often trip over themselves trying to explain this bizarre policy, and always fall back on the empty mantra that “Jerusalem should remain undivided, but is subject to negotiation”.
This position has essentially granted the Arabs a veto over the US power of recognition, which in turn has a huge influence on how other nations worldwide view the city. And the sad truth is that the longer the “Question” of Jerusalem has been left open, the larger that question has become. It has reached the point that Jerusalem has become the capital of everyone else except the Jews.
Thus at the Fatah general assembly in Bethlehem in August, the largest Palestinian faction declared that Jerusalem is "the eternal capital of Palestine, the Arab world and the Islamic and Christian worlds".

Capital of the Arab world? Capital of Islam?

The Arabs and Muslims had centuries to make Jerusalem their capital, but never did. It was always considered a ‘backwater’ provincial town when in Arab or Muslim hands. Consider that only one Muslim ruler visited Jerusalem during the two decades it was in Jordanian hands from 1948 through 1967.
The city has truly been the capital of only one nation the Jewish commonwealth based on an historical, spiritual and cultural attachment that dates back 3,000 years.
The recent machinations of the Obama administration have also managed to expose the moral bankruptcy of US policy on Jerusalem. Now Washington may argue that continued Jewish building in Jerusalem might prejudice the outcome of negotiations. But so does continued Arab building! After all, both sides lay claim to east Jerusalem, and even-handedness therefore requires that either all can build or none can build.
Otherwise, you are validating the bitter anomaly that for a mere 19 years of its long history, east Jerusalem was Judenrein rendered so by the force of Arab arms.
This stands in sharp contrast to the rest of the city’s long and glorious past. Whenever the Bible speaks of Jerusalem, from the time the Lord chose the city through the heart of King David (II Chronicles 6), it is speaking of what we know today as east Jerusalem. None of these many verses of Scripture refer to western Jerusalem, because that portion of the modern city only arose within the past 100 years. And this same sacred Book promises that the Lord “will again choose Jerusalem” (Zechariah 2:12).
May that day come speedily!
David Parsons
Media Director
International Christian Embassy Jerusalem

STOP POKING GOD IN THE EYE

Lessons for today from I Samuel 11

Printer-friendly versionSend by email
Posted on: 
 Tue, 31 May 2011 (All day) +0200
Stop poking God in the eye
I Samuel 11 tells the fascinating story of how Israel came to be united under Saul’s kingship.  As with all Old Testament stories, God has given them to us so we can learn from them and apply the principles revealed therein. This story is no different, and even gives us invaluable insight into how the Lord views events happening in our own lifetime.
In this chapter, the Ammonites come up against Jabesh. The people of Jabesh seek terms of peace but are presented with a horrible proposition; in return for peace the Ammonites want the right to cut out the right eye of every man and bring a reproach on all Israel.
Apart from the stigma and shame attached with having a whole community’s eyesight disabled, it is also evident that the Ammonites sought to ensure that Jabesh remained immobilized, defenceless against future attacks. If the men of Jabesh could not defend themselves well with both eyes, removing the right eye would certainly ensure that even in the future they would not be able to rise to the challenge and the Ammonites could seek further sacrifices for “peace” whenever they desired.
On May 19th, 2011, the President of the USA announced a change in policy regarding his country’s position as peace broker between the Israelis and the Palestinians. Whereas previously no administration had outlined what it believed was the territorial starting position for negotiations, but had left that for the two parties to work out, President Obama stated that the pre-1967 borders should now be the basis for the renewal of talks. Areas that do not fall within these territories, such as many Israeli towns in Judea and Samaria, along with historic Jerusalem (so-called East Jerusalem), could be resolved, the President said, via land swaps.
The Group of Eight leaders, representing the most economically powerful nations on earth, were swift to endorse Obama’s position in a statement released on May 27th, 2011.
Prime Minister Netanyahu, Israel’s premier, was quick to reject this new approach since it would return Israel to a territorial position that is not defendable. Every American administration up until this one has understood that after all the wars Israel has fought to defend itself against the Arab plans for her annihilation, she requires defendable borders to live in peace and security.
Not only that, but if the pre-1967 borders are the starting point for peace, Israel faces again the shameful prospect of having to send in its own armed forces to forcibly uproot thousands of its citizens from their homes as the world watches on through the lenses of western media companies that have systematically reduced these people to dehumanized illegal settlers, and blamed them for the lack of peace in the entire region, if not the world.
Make no mistake, the Palestinians do not recognize Israel’s right to exist, and they have always sought an agreement with Israel that leaves the door open for further attacks on her sovereignty. Like the Ammonites, they offer peace in return for Israel’s shame. They will only come to an agreement if the Israelis cut out their right eye by removing their so-called settlements, and in so doing, also return to a situation where they are more vulnerable to further attacks. Unfortunately, the US President has led the way in adding considerable weight to their cause and the Israelis, like the people of Jabesh, find themselves isolated and outnumbered in this conflict.
Going back to I Samuel 11, we find that the people of Jabesh seek help and their messengers reach Saul. But, the Saul they find is not sitting in a kingly palace with thousands of troops at his command; he’s out in the field herding flocks. He had been crowned king already, but not all the people accepted his appointment and it seems as if life just went back to normal for Israel and Saul, up until this point that is.
When Saul hears the news, something remarkable happens. The Spirit of God comes upon him and he becomes extremely angry.  He hews a yoke of oxen into pieces, sends them throughout the land as warning of what will happen to the oxen of those who don’t come out to fight, and he manages to raise an army of 330,000 which goes on to demolish the Ammonites and save Jabesh. The people rally around Saul after this victory, gathering in Gilgal to renew the kingdom and make Saul king before God.
Saul clearly didn’t have the force of arms to back up his threat, but the fear of Lord fell on the people as Saul followed the Spirit’s leading and this brought forth salvation.
It’s not often that we associate the Holy Spirit with anger, or righteous indignation as some translations use. We are more accustomed to the Holy Spirit bringing peace or joy in the face of adversity. But God is clearly able to experience the emotions we humans know and when the Holy Spirit is at work in our lives, He can even impart on us His very personal feelings regarding a situation.
In Zechariah 2: 8 it says of Zion, “he who touches you touches the apple of His eye”. Your eye is the most sensitive part of your body. When the Ammonites came to Jabesh with the intent of cutting out the men’s right eyes, they didn’t realize that they had poked God in the eye, in His most sensitive area, and aroused His anger. It’s a warning to all nations that would seek to come up against Israel to dispossess her of her God-given inheritance.
In these days when the nations are out repeating the mistake of the Ammonites, the question for us is how in tune are we to the Holy Spirit? How well are we connected with God’s feelings on the issue? Are we outraged? Are we speaking up to ensure that our nations are warned as to the consequence of their actions?
Like Saul, we have been anointed, but haven’t yet received a kingdom. I Peter 2: 9 says we are a “chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation”. We don’t have physical armies under our command, but our power is in the fear of the Lord. He will bring the victory.
Isaiah 41 confirms that the Lord will deliver Israel and will destroy those who come against her. Our mission at the ICEJ has always been to speak words of comfort to Zion, to let her know that her God will surely rescue her, while also speaking a word of warning to the nations about how they treat the people of the covenant. Never has there been a time when these messages are more important.
For the sake of our own nations, we must find our voice and tell our leaders to please stop poking God in the eye.

Daryl Hedding serves as Strategic Development Director for the ICEJ.

THE QUESTION OF JERUSALEM

Seeking God’s mercy upon our nation

Printer-friendly versionSend by email


Jerusalem a Settlement?

The Obama administration’s demands in 2009 that east Jerusalem be included in a total freeze on Jewish settlement activity has brought to the fore once again the very issue upon which the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem was founded the unity of Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was genuinely caught off guard in May of that year when US President Barack Obama began openly insisting on a complete halt to all Jewish building in the disputed territories. The Netanyahu government was trying to work out a deal to allow some continued growth in the settlements when the US State Department then made clear they expected this construction ban to also extend to east Jerusalem.
To be fair, this is not the first American administration to issue twisted directives on Jerusalem. US policy on Jerusalem has long been legally absurd. The astonishing fact is that Washington has never recognised any part of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. State Department officials often trip over themselves trying to explain this bizarre policy, and always fall back on the empty mantra that “Jerusalem should remain undivided, but is subject to negotiation”.
This position has essentially granted the Arabs a veto over the US power of recognition, which in turn has a huge influence on how other nations worldwide view the city. And the sad truth is that the longer the “Question” of Jerusalem has been left open, the larger that question has become. It has reached the point that Jerusalem has become the capital of everyone else except the Jews.
Thus at the Fatah general assembly in Bethlehem in August, the largest Palestinian faction declared that Jerusalem is "the eternal capital of Palestine, the Arab world and the Islamic and Christian worlds".

Capital of the Arab world? Capital of Islam?

The Arabs and Muslims had centuries to make Jerusalem their capital, but never did. It was always considered a ‘backwater’ provincial town when in Arab or Muslim hands. Consider that only one Muslim ruler visited Jerusalem during the two decades it was in Jordanian hands from 1948 through 1967.
The city has truly been the capital of only one nation the Jewish commonwealth based on an historical, spiritual and cultural attachment that dates back 3,000 years.
The recent machinations of the Obama administration have also managed to expose the moral bankruptcy of US policy on Jerusalem. Now Washington may argue that continued Jewish building in Jerusalem might prejudice the outcome of negotiations. But so does continued Arab building! After all, both sides lay claim to east Jerusalem, and even-handedness therefore requires that either all can build or none can build.
Otherwise, you are validating the bitter anomaly that for a mere 19 years of its long history, east Jerusalem was Judenrein rendered so by the force of Arab arms.
This stands in sharp contrast to the rest of the city’s long and glorious past. Whenever the Bible speaks of Jerusalem, from the time the Lord chose the city through the heart of King David (II Chronicles 6), it is speaking of what we know today as east Jerusalem. None of these many verses of Scripture refer to western Jerusalem, because that portion of the modern city only arose within the past 100 years. And this same sacred Book promises that the Lord “will again choose Jerusalem” (Zechariah 2:12).
May that day come speedily!
David Parsons
Media Director
International Christian Embassy Jerusalem
©2010 International Christian Embassy Jerusalem

What is Palestine? Who are the Palestinians?



What is Palestine? Who are the Palestinians?



The Arab-Israeli conflict is presented in the media as a territorial dispute, a common argument asserts that in the territory of the present state of Israel they’re used to reside thousand-year-old Arab Palestinian people which was forcibly evicted by the Zionist Jews.
In order to evaluate these claims we must examine the historical facts we shall do this in what follows.It was the Romans who in the second century of the Common Era first used the name Syria Palestina for Jerusalem and surrounding areas. It was an incorrect usage in Greek Palestina means homeland of the Philistines, but the Philistines never occupied more than a tiny sliver on the eastern Mediterranean coast including part of what is todays the Gaza Strip and they had ceased to exist centuries earlier.
The Romans had conquered a place called Kingdom of Judah and they themselves after possessing it call it province of Judea, both names mean homeland of the Jews.
Why then did the Romans change the name to Syria Palestina? This is an important question.
Jewish community and religion are organized around the law of Moses which according to exodus was born in an Egyptian slave revolt and this explains why the law of Moses denounces oppression and protects the poor, it also explains the preoccupations of the Roman military aristocracy, in those days the Jews were very large population distributed throughout the Mediterranean. The greatest worry of the Romans was that the popularity of the Law of Moses among the oppressed peoples of the empire might result in revolution.
In order to avoid such an outcome the Empire launched enormous mass killings of Jews remembered today as the first Jewish War, the Diaspora Revolt, and the second Jewish War. According to historians, taken together and in proportional terms, the Romans killed perhaps more Jews than did Adolf Hitler once the genocides had been concluded. Emperor Hadrian, after destroying Jerusalem in the second century, brought Greeks to settle it and forbade the entrance to Jews under pain of death. The city was renamed Aelia Capitolina and the area Syria Palestina. In political terms Palestine means there are no Jews here nor do we allow them.
Some Jews stubbornly remained in the Holy Land and many others soon returned the Romans informally continued to call the place Judea. With the passing at the centuries the name Palestine was used less and less and seized to have a clear referent. Under the Turkish Ottoman Empire, overlord of the area from the 16th century, there was no administrative or political entity called Palestine.
In the 20th century after wrenching the Middle East from the Turks in World War 1 the British revived the name when they created the British Mandate for Palestine. But their final definition of Palestine in 1922 was just 1/4th of the land mass that they themselves had baptized Palestine two years before.
Such arbitrariness supports the complaint of Arab historian Philip Hitti who testified in 1946 before the Anglo-American committee of inquiry that there is no such thing as Palestine in history, absolutely not!
But if the name Palestine is an artificial creation of the Roman Empire and later of the British Empire then who are the so-called Palestinians? That question was answered by the Zahir Muhsein the chief of military operations of the Palestine Liberation Organization or P.L.O. now better known as the Palestinian Authority. In an interview with Dutch magazine Trauw, Muhsein explained:
“We are all part of ONE people, the Arab nation… We are one people. Just for political reasons we carefully underwrite our Palestinian identity. Because it is of national interest for the Arabs to advocate the existence of Palestinians to balance Zionism.”
“Yes, the existence of a separate Palestinian identity exists only for tactical reasons. The establishment of a Palestinian state is a new tool to continue the fight against Israel and for Arab unity.”
Why does Muhsein say a new tool to continue the fight against Israel? In war after war the combined efforts of several Arab Muslim states were defeated by tiny Israel again and again, so a new tool was needed, a political warfare strategy that combined terrorism with diplomacy to achieve what open warfare could not.
But is Zahir Muhsein saying that the Palestinian people with the presumed right to the land the Jewish state was simply invented? The PLO charters appear to confirm this.
In its first charter dated 1964 the PLO defined Palestine in article 2 with its boundaries at the time at the British Mandate. This is a reference to the second arbitrary definition at the British from 1922. How can a twentieth-century foreign colonial power arbitrarily define the boundaries of the supposedly ancestral land of the Palestinians? But in truth the PLO did not even really adopt the British definition in Article 24 the PLO explicitly asserted the Judea, Samaria and Gaza the territories which it now claims for its desired state were not Palestinian.
“Article 24: This organization does not exercise any territorial sovereignty over the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan or on the Gaza Strip. “
In 1968 the PLO rewrote its charter, this time the definition of Palestine did not exclude Gaza, Judea and Samaria so the PLO was now claiming these territories. What explains the change?
In 1964 when the PLO wrote its first charter Egypt was illegally occupying Gaza and Jordan was illegally occupying Judea and Samaria. But then the Arab states provoked the war of 1967 or six-day war in which the Israelis captured the territories of Gaza, Judea and Samaria among others. It was after this that the PLO rewrote its constitution, in 1968, this time including Gaza, Judea and Samaria in its definition of Palestine.
The borders of Palestine are therefore flexible and are redrawn to surround exactly the territory which Israel controls. In other words, the borders of Palestine are chosen nearly so that it can be used as a tool to continue the fight against Israel.
But if Palestine is a recent invention and the same goes for the Palestinian identity, then where do the Arab Muslims now calling themselves Palestinian come from?
Today about 8 million people live in Israel, but the most reliable estimate about the 19th century puts the population of this area at 300,000, it was practically empty and that is how nineteenth century travelers described it.
For example in the mid-nineteenth century the British consul complained that the area was empty of inhabitants. When Mark Twain visited he remarked that into the Jezreel Valley there wasn’t a single village to be found for thirty miles all around. And visiting French author Pierre Loti wrote that cities and palaces had turned to dust.
In a historical study Karl Hermann Voss explained all this as a result that the Arab Muslim conquest, in the twelve and a half centuries between the Arab conquest in the seventh century and the beginnings of the Jewish return in the 1880s Palestine was laid waste, its ancient canal in irrigation systems were destroyed and the wondrous fertility of which the Bible spoke vanished into desert and desolation. Under the Ottoman Empire the Turks the policy up the spoliation continued the hillsides were denuded of trees in the valleys fraud up there topsoil.
The few people who lived there were a majority Muslim but they were divided by various identities some of them violently opposed to each other and none of them Palestinian. There were also small Jewish communities in the large settlements and in the villages of Galilee and also large populations in Jerusalem Hebron, Saffed and Tiberias. In Jerusalem in fact the Jews were majority; a document from the British Consulate dated 1859 States:
“The Muslims of Jerusalem do not exceed a fourth of the entire population”
In 1878 two years before the Zionist migrations began the Ottoman Sultan launched a resettlement policy to bring foreign Muslims, mainly circulations in Algerians. Historian Arnold Blumberg explains:
“After 1880, the forces of nascent Jewish nationalism, foreign Moslem colonization sponsored by the Turks, and spontaneous Arab immigration prompted by the new prosperity of Palestine changed the demographic face of the land.”
Given that starting in 1878 enormous waves of Muslim immigration began arriving in what was essentially an empty territory, it is obvious that the vast majority of those now calling themselves Palestinian do not have thousand-year-old roots in the place.
This is confirmed by the UN’s behavior for it has defined a Palestinian refugee as any non-Jew who left during the war of 1948 in whose family had been residing in the area even just two years before that. Without such a definition the population of so-called Palestinian refugees would dwindle almost to nothing.
Everybody recognizes that the Zionist Jews settled mostly on barren lands that nobody was using. The very King Abdullah of Trans-Jordan, who would participate in the effort to destroy the nascent Jewish state in 1948, wrote in 1946:
“I was astonished at what I saw of the Jewish settlements they have colonized the sand dunes, drawn water from them and transformed them into a paradise.”
The Jewish recovery of the land produced an economic explosion that attracted many Arabs from neighboring countries looking for a better life and the fattened the numbers of those who would later call themselves Palestinians. Many believe however that the Zionist Jews stole the lands upon which they settled using force, that question was answered by Haj Amin al-Husseini the father the Palestinian movement.
In 1936 Husseini Mufti of Jerusalem launched his fourth grade terrorist assault against the Jews of British Mandate Palestine, he called it the Arab Revolt, and this violence lasted until 1939.
In 1937 the British government sent a team to investigate headed by Lord Peel, his mission was to establish what was happening and why, he called Husseini as witness.
Sir Laurie Hammond asked Husseini whether the problem was that the Jews taken Arab lands by force.
Husseini replied: “In most cases the lands were acquired”
Sir Laurie Hammond: ‘I mean forcibly acquired compulsory acquisition as land would be acquired for public purposes?”
Husseini: “no it wasn’t”
Sir Laurie Hammond: “not taken by compulsory acquisition”
Husseini: “no”
Sir Laurie Hammond: “but these lands amounting to some 700,000 dunams were actually sold?
Husseini: “yes they were sold, but the country was placed in such conditions as would facilitate such purchases.”
Sir Laurie Hammond: “I don’t quite understand what you mean by that. They were sold. Who sold them?
Husseini: “Landowners”
Sir Laurie Hammond: “Arabs?”
Husseini: “In most cases they were Arabs”
Sir Laurie Hammond: “Was any compulsion put on them to sell? If so, by whom?
Husseini: “As in other countries, there are people who by force of circumstances, economic forces, sell their land.”
The Arab landowners who according to Husseini had been forced to sell their land were the effendi, the great feudal lords of the area, they did whatever they liked nobody forced them to sell and they had sold their least productive lands at very high price.
In fact Husseini’s own family, among the largest effendi landowners, was doing a brisk business with the sales. The Husseini first would threaten the small landowners with death if they dared commit the so-called national crime of selling land to Jews, then they would buy these plots at fire sale prices consolidate them and resell them at extortionate prices to the Zionist Jews.
Historian Nathan Weinstock explains:
“In other words, hyper nationalist propaganda became a lucrative industry, indeed even an American-style racket, for the Arab Gentry.”
To conclude, it is false to say that thousand-year-old Palestinian people had its ancestral land taken by force by the Zionist Jews. First because there was no such Palestinian people in the land and second because the Zionist Jews bought their lands from willing Arab land owners at prices well above the usual market rate.

The Root Cause of all the conflicts in the Middle East










The Root Cause of all the conflicts in the Middle East




Why are so many of the grandchildren of Nazis and Nazi collaborators who brought us the Holocaust once again declaring war on the Jews?
Why have we seen such an increase in anti-Semitism and irrationally virulent anti-Zionism in western Europe?
To answer these questions, a myth must first be exposed. That myth is the one perpetrated by the French, the Dutch, the Norwegians, the Swiss, the Belgians, the Austrians, and many other western Europeans: namely that the Holocaust was solely the work of German Nazis aided perhaps by some Polish, Ukrainian, Latvian, Lithuanian, and Estonian collaborators.
FALSE.
The Holocaust was perpetrated by Europeans — by Nazi sympathizers and collaborators among the French, Dutch, Norwegians, Swiss, Belgians, Austrians and other Europeans, both Western and Eastern.
Jews and Arabs have been tricked by the winners of WW1, Britain and France (Europe) into war for 95 years, until 1919 Jews and Arabs used to be allies. The middle east was supposed to become 1 big Arab Kingdom with 1 Jewish nation. Some feared for Europe’s Economy if there would have been 2 countries in the middle east living in peace since WW1, a Jewish state and 1 Arab kingdom. By looking deep into the history you can see we are being fooled for the interest of Europe’s economy.
The middle east, which is a strategic location in the world and rich in natural resources, was supposed to become a scientifically advanced Union between Arabs and Jews.
Think about how many people have died for nothing, the Jews could have had a country to flee roman antisemitism in the world since the 1920’s, there would not have been a holocaust, there would not have all those wars and terror.
The Arabs would not have been oppressed since the 1920’s by puppet illegitimate dictators, there would not have been an Al-Husseini, a Saud , an Arafat , a Qaddafi, a Saddam Hussein, a Assad Father, A Assad Son,… no Arab spring… no Bin Laden no Hammas no Jihad….
If you understand history you can see that the past and current peace projects and anti-Zionists are part of the anti Arab Jewish union policy that hides history and fuels the conflict, so that others can profit. By understanding history we can revert all propaganda and have a true peace.
On March 23, 1918, Al Qibla, the daily newspaper of Mecca, printed the following words in support of the Balfour Declaration of 1917:
“The resources of the country [Palestine] are still virgin soil and will be developed by the Jewish immigrants (…) we have seen the Jews from foreign countries streaming to Palestine from Russia, Germany, Austria, Spain, and America. The cause of causes could not escape those who had a gift of deeper insight. They knew that the country was for its original sons [abna’ihi-l-asliyin], for all their differences, a sacred and beloved homeland. The return of these exiles [jaliya] to their homeland will prove materially and spiritually an experimental school for their brethren who are with them in the fields, factories, trades and all things connected to the land.”
After WW1 Britain and France back stabbed the Arabs and Jews, divided the land and removed the Rightful King of the Arabs and changed Islam, and its recognition of Zionism by putting the Sauds in power over Mecca instead of the Hashemites (descendents of Mohammad)
The True Arab King (descendant of Mohammad) invited the Jews to return to Palestine.
part 2: listen to what he says in the beginning, the Brits were trying to convince the Arabs not to make a Union with the Jews, but the Arabs told them Jews are good for Arabs
638 C.E. – Muslim Caliph Omar liberates Jerusalem from the Byzantine Christians and welcomes Jews back to the Holy City
Muslim Caliph Omar, who liberated Jerusalem from the Byzantine Christians in 638 C.E., six years after the death of Muhammad in 632 C.E., revoked Hadrian’s 500 year-old ban on Jewish settlement in Jerusalem, which the Byzantines had kept in force. Omar welcomed the Jews back to Jerusalem. The returning Jews built the Bet HaMenorot (House of Menorahs) synagogue (named for the menorahs drawn on its walls), excavated in 1998 by Professor Naveh Mazar of the Hebrew University.
1187 C.E. – Muslim Sultan Salah-e-Din liberates Jerusalem from the European Catholic Crusaders and welcomes Jews back to the Holy City
Muslim Sultan Salah-e-Din, the great Kurdish leader, liberated Jerusalem from the European Catholic Crusaders in 1187 C.E. He suggested to Rabbi Moses ben Maimon (Maimonides, who was Salah-e-Din’s doctor) that Maimonides urge Jews to return and resettle Jerusalem (as recorded by another Jewish scholar of those times, Rabbi Yehuda al-Harizi). The famous Ramban (Nachmanides) Synagogue in Jerusalem’s Old City was built by the returning Jews several decades later during the period of Mameluk Muslim rule. The synagogue bears witness to this return.
18th Century – Muslim Sheikh Dahr-el-Omar invites Jews to resettle the Galilee
Muslim Sheikh Dahr-el-Omar, who took control of Galilee from the Turks in the 18th century, told leading rabbis in Constantinople and Morocco that the period of Jewish exile was over and that Jews should return to the Land of Israel to rebuild it. From that time on, the movement for Jewish return to the Land of Israel gained momentum.
20th Century – Feisal-Frankfurter Correspondence (March 1919)
On March 23, 1918, Al Qibla, the daily newspaper of Mecca, printed the following words in support of the Balfour Declaration of 1917:
“The resources of the country [Palestine] are still virgin soil and will be developed by the Jewish immigrants (…) we have seen the Jews from foreign countries streaming to Palestine from Russia, Germany, Austria, Spain, and America. The cause of causes could not escape those who had a gift of deeper insight. They knew that the country was for its original sons [abna’ihi-l-asliyin], for all their differences, a sacred and beloved homeland. The return of these exiles [jaliya] to their homeland will prove materially and spiritually an experimental school for their brethren who are with them in the fields, factories, trades and all things connected to the land.”
Feisal-Frankfurter Correspondence (March 1919)
Letter from Emir Feisal (Son of Hussen Ibn Ali, Sharif of Mecca) to Felix Frankfurter, associate of Dr. Chaim Weizmann:
DELEGATION HEDJAZIENNE
Paris Peace Conference
March 3, 1919
Dear Mr. Frankfurter:
I want to take this opportunity of my first contact with American Zionists to tell you what I have often been able to say to Dr. Weizmann in Arabia and Europe.
We feel that the Arabs and Jews are cousins in having suffered similar oppressions at the hands of powers stronger than themselves, and by a happy coincidence have been able to take the first step towards the attainment of their national ideals together.
The Arabs, especially the educated among us, look with the deepest sympathy on the Zionist movement. Our deputation here in Paris is fully acquainted with the proposals submitted yesterday by the Zionist Organisation to the Peace Conference, and we regard them as moderate and proper. We will do our best, in so far as we are concerned, to help them through: we will wish the Jews a most hearty welcome home.
With the chiefs of your movement, especially with Dr. Weizmann, we have had and continue to have the closest relations. He has been a great helper of our cause, and I hope the Arabs may soon be in a position to make the Jews some return for their kindness. We are working together for a reformed and revived Near East, and our two movements complete one another. The Jewish movement is national and not imperialist. Our movement is national and not imperialist, and there is room in Syria for us both. Indeed I think that neither can be a real success without the other.
People less informed and less responsible than our leaders and yours, ignoring the need for cooperation of the Arabs and Zionists, have been trying to exploit the local difficulties that must necessarily arise in Palestine in the early stages of our movements. Some of them have, I am afraid, misrepresented your aims to the Arab peasantry, and our aims to the Jewish peasantry, with the result that interested parties have been able to make capital out of what they call our differences.
I wish to give you my firm conviction that these differences are not on questions of principle, but on matters of detail such as must inevitably occur in every contact of neighbouring peoples, and as are easily adjusted by mutual good will. Indeed nearly all of them will disappear with fuller knowledge.
I look forward, and my people with me look forward, to a future in which we will help you and you will help us, so that the countries in which we are mutually interested may once again take their places in the community of civilised peoples of the world.
Believe me,
Yours sincerely,
(Sgd.) Feisal
Letter of reply from Felix Frankfurter to Emir Feisal:
Paris Peace Conference
March 5, 1919
Royal Highness,
Allow me, on behalf of the Zionist Organisation, to acknowledge your recent letter with deep appreciation.
Those of us who come from the United States have already been gratified by the friendly relations and the active cooperation maintained between you and the Zionist leaders, particularly Dr. Weizmann. We knew it could not be otherwise; we knew that the aspirations of the Arab and the Jewish peoples were parallel, that each aspired to re-establish its nationality in its own homeland, each making its own distinctive contribution to civilisation, each seeking its own peaceful mode of life.
The Zionist leaders and the Jewish people for whom they speak have watched with satisfaction the spiritual vigour of the Arab movement. Themselves seeking justice, they are anxious that the just national aims of the Arab people be confirmed and safeguarded by the Peace Conference.
We knew from your acts and your past utterances that the Zionist movement — in other words the national aim of the Jewish people — had your support and the support of the Arab people for whom you speak. These aims are now before the Peace Conference as definite proposals by the Zionist Organisation. We are happy indeed that you consider these proposals “moderate and proper,” and that we have in you a staunch supporter for their realisation.
For both the Arab and the Jewish peoples there are difficulties ahead — difficulties that challenge the united statesmanship of Arab and Jewish leaders. For it is no easy task to rebuild two great civilisations that have been suffering oppression and misrule for centuries. We each have our difficulties we shall work out as friends, friends who are animated by similar purposes, seeking a free and full development for the two neighbouring peoples. The Arabs and Jews are neighbours in territory; we cannot but live side by side as friends.
Very respectfully,
(Sgd.) Felix Frankfurter
Agreement Between Emir Feisal and Dr. Weizmann
3 January 1919
His Royal Highness the Emir Feisal, representing and acting on behalf of the Arab Kingdom of Hedjaz, and Dr. Chaim Weizmann, representing and acting on behalf of the Zionist Organization, mindful of the racial kinship and ancient bonds existing between the Arabs and the Jewish people, and realizing that the surest means of working out the consummation of their natural aspirations is through the closest possible collaboration in the development of the Arab State and Palestine, and being desirous further of confirming the good understanding which exists between them, have agreed upon the following:
Articles:
Article I
The Arab State and Palestine in all their relations and undertakings shall be controlled by the most cordial goodwill and understanding, and to this end Arab and Jewish duly accredited agents shall be established and maintained in the respective territories.
Article II
Immediately following the completion of the deliberations of the Peace Conference, the definite boundaries between the Arab State and Palestine shall be determined by a Commission to be agreed upon by the parties hereto.
Article III
In the establishment of the Constitution and Administration of Palestine, all such measures shall be adopted as will afford the fullest guarantees for carrying into effect the British Government’s Declaration of the 2nd of November, 1917.
Article IV
All necessary measures shall be taken to encourage and stimulate immigration of Jews into Palestine on a large scale, and as quickly as possible to settle Jewish immigrants upon the land through closer settlement and intensive cultivation of the soil. In taking such measures the Arab peasant and tenant farmers shall be protected in their rights and shall be assisted in forwarding their economic development.
Article V
No regulation or law shall be made prohibiting or interfering in any way with the free exercise of religion; and further, the free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship, without discrimination or preference, shall forever be allowed. No religious test shall ever be required for the exercise of civil or political rights.
Article VI
The Mohammedan Holy Places shall be under Mohammedan control.
Article VII
The Zionist Organization proposes to send to Palestine a Commission of experts to make a survey of the economic possibilities of the country, and to report upon the best means for its development. The Zionist Organization will place the aforementioned Commission at the disposal of the Arab State for the purpose of a survey of the economic possibilities of the Arab State and to report upon the best means for its development. The Zionist Organization will use its best efforts to assist the Arab State in providing the means for developing the natural resources and economic possibilities thereof.
Article VIII
The parties hereto agree to act in complete accord and harmony on all matters embraced herein before the Peace Congress.
Article IX
Any matters of dispute which may arise between the contracting parties hall be referred to the British Government for arbitration.
Given under our hand at London, England, the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and nineteen
Chaim Weizmann Feisal Ibn-Hussein
Reservation by the Emir Feisal
If the Arabs are established as I have asked in my manifesto of 4 January, addressed to the British Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, I will carry out what is written in this agreement. If changes are made, I cannot be answerable for failing to carry out this agreement.
In 1947 Weizmann still had a fresh memory of history, it is long but very interesting
The Saud’s with support of the British removed his father Ḥusayn bin ‘Alī al-Hashimi (descendant of Muhammad) from being the Sharif of Mecca, and the French threw him Faisal bin Hussein bin Ali al-Hashimi out of Greater-Syria.
The root cause of the conflict is that Europe removed the rightful heirs to the leadership of Islam and Mecca. And replaced them with puppets.The Hashemite’s trace their ancestry from Hashim ibn ‘Abd Manaf (died c. 511 AD), the great-grandfather of the prophet, Muhammad.
And the Kings of Jordan are only but brother/nephews of Faisal bin Hussein bin Ali al-Hashimi they themself betrayed there family and joined the British for might, they were never supposed to be Kings.
Until 1920 there was an agreement to make an Economical-Union in the middle east, the plan was that there would be only 1 Arab Kingdom (Faisal bin Hussein bin Ali al-Hashimi as King) and 1 refuge homeland for the Jewish people but if there would have been 1 stable union in the Middle East it would have been very bad for Europe’s post Colonialism economy, so they created the conflict.The Arab Kingdom of Syria (Arabic: المملكة العربية السورية, al-Mamlakah al-Sūriyya al-‘Arabīyah), was the first modern Arab state to come into existence, but only lasted a little over four months (8 March–24 July 1920). During its brief existence, the kingdom was led by Sharif Hussein bin Ali’s son Faisal bin Hussein. Despite its claims to territory of a Greater Syria, Faisal’s government controlled a limited area and was dependent on Britain which, along with France, generally opposed the idea of a Greater Syria and refused to recognize Faisal as its king. The kingdom surrendered to French forces on 24 July 1920.
But his brother Abdullah bin ‘Alī al-Hashimi did not help Faisal stay in power, but:In March 1920, the Hashemite Kingdom of Syria was declared by Faisal I of Iraq in Damascus which encompassed most of what later became Transjordan. At this point, the southern part of Transjordan was part of the Hashemite Kingdom of Hejaz. Following the provision of mandate to France and Britain at San Remo in April, the British appointed a High Commissioner in Palestine with a remit over the area west of the Jordan, and the French ended the Kingdom of Syria at the battle of Maysalun. Transjordan became, for a short time, a no man’s land. In August 1920, Sir Herbert Samuel’s request to extend the frontier of British territory beyond the River Jordan and to bring Transjordan under his administrative control was rejected. The British Foreign Secretary, Lord Curzon, proposed instead that British influence in Transjordan should be advanced by sending a few political officers, without military escort, to encourage self-government and give advice to local leaders in the territory. Following Curzon’s instruction Samuel set up a meeting with Transjordanian leaders where he presented British plans for the territory. The local leaders were reassured that Transjordan would not come under Palestinian administration and that there would be no disarmament or conscription. Samuel’s terms were accepted, he returned to Jerusalem, leaving Captain Alex Kirkbride as the British representative east of the Jordan until the arrival on 21 November 1920 of Abdullah, the brother of recently deposed king Faisal, who marched into Ma’an at the head of an army of 300 men. Without facing opposition Abdullah and his army had effectively occupied most of Tranjordan by March 1921.
And then, Abdullah bin ‘Alī al-Hashimi betrayed his Father and his Brother and joined Britain and the Europeans for power:
When French forces captured Damascus at the Battle of Maysalun and expelled his brother Faisal, Abdullah moved his forces from Hejaz into Transjordan with a view to liberating Damascus, where his brother had been proclaimed King in 1918. Having heard of Abdullah’s plans, Winston Churchill invited Abdullah to a famous “tea party” where he convinced Abdullah to stay put and not attack Britain’s allies, the French. Churchill told Abdullah that French forces were superior to his and that the British did not want any trouble with the French. Abdullah acquiesced and was rewarded when the British created a protectorate for him, which later became a state; Transjordan. He embarked on negotiations with the British to gain independence, resulting in the announcement of the Emirate of Transjordan’s independence on 25 May 1946 as the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan (renamed simply Jordan in 1949). This date is Jordan’s official independence day. On March 8, 1920, Abdullah was announced as King of Iraq, a position he never accepted, by the Iraqi Congress. After his refusal, his brother who had just been defeated in Syria and was in need of a kingdom, accepted the position.[1]Abdullah set about the task of building Transjordan with the help of a reserve force headed by Lieutenant-Colonel Frederick Peake, who was seconded from the Palestine police in 1921. The force, renamed the Arab Legion, in 1923 was led by Glubb Pasha (Sir John Bagot Glubb) between 1930 and 1956.[5]Although Abdullah established a legislative council in 1928 its role remained advisory leaving him to rule as an autocrat.[5]During the Second World War Abdullah was a faithful ally of the British, maintaining strict order within Transjordan, and helping to suppress a pro-Axis uprising in Iraq. His army, the Arab Legion assisted in the occupation of Iraq and Syria.[1]Prime Ministers under Abdullah formed 18 governments during the 23 years of the Emirate. On May 25, 1946, in Amman, he was crowned first King of Transjordan (Jordan).
The Brits and French had won, he did not even go join his brother, was mad at him, and then went to live in England, where his “fake” friend Lawrence advised him to leave the dream of the one Kingdom behind and to become King of Iraq which was a flawed concept from the start, because people in Iraq did barely know him and where big percentage of Shiites:
On 7 March 1920, Faisal was proclaimed King of the Arab Kingdom of Syria (Greater Syria) by the Syrian National Congress government of Hashim al-Atassi. In April 1920, the San Remo conference gave France the mandate for Syria, which led to the Franco-Syrian War. In the Battle of Maysalun on 24 July 1920, the French were victorious and Faisal was expelled from Syria. He went to live in the United Kingdom in August of that year.
In March 1921, at the Cairo Conference, the British decided that Faisal was a good candidate for ruling the British Mandate of Iraq because of his apparent conciliatory attitude towards the great power and based on advice from T. E. Lawrence, more commonly known as Lawrence of Arabia. But, in 1921, few people living in Iraq even knew who Faisal was or had ever heard his name. With help of British officials, including Mrs Gertrude Bell, he successfully campaigned among the Arabs of Iraq and won over popular support.The British government, mandate holders in Iraq, were concerned at the unrest in the colony. They decided to step back from direct administration and create a monarchy to head Iraq while they maintained the mandate. Following a plebiscite showing 96% in favour, which was not really accurate, but created by a British council of ministers who wanted to put Faisal in power, Faisal agreed to become king. In August 1921 he was made king of Iraq.
During World War I, the British government established diplomatic relations with Ibn Saud. The British agent, Captain William Shakespear, was well received by the Bedouin. Similar diplomatic missions were established with any Arabian power who might have been able to unify and stabilize the region. The British entered into a treaty in December 1915 (the “Treaty of Darin”) which made the lands of the House of Saud a British protectorate and attempted to define the boundaries of the developing Saudi state. In exchange, Ibn Saud pledged to again make war against Ibn Rashid, who was an ally of the Ottomans.The British Foreign Office had previously begun to support Sharif Hussein bin Ali, Emir of the Hejaz by sending Lawrence of Arabia to him in 1915. The Saudi Ikhwan began to conflict with Emir Feisal also in 1917 just as his sons Abdullah and Faisal entered Damascus. The Treaty of Darin remained in effect until superseded by the Jeddah conference of 1927 and the Dammam conference of 1952 during both of which Ibn Saud extended his boundaries past the Anglo-Ottoman Blue Line. After Darin, he stockpiled the weapons and supplies which the British provided him, including a ‘tribute’ of £5,000 per month. After World War I, he received further support from the British, including a glut of surplus munitions. He launched his campaign against the Al Rashidi in 1920; by 1922 they had been all but destroyed.
On 3 March 1924, when the Grand National Assembly of Turkey formally abolished the caliphate. Hussein bin Ali then proclaimed himself caliph, basing his claim on his prophetic ancestry and his control of Islam’s two holiest mosques, the Masjid al-Haram and Masjid al-Nabawi (collectively known as the Haramayn, Arabic: الحرمين). Possession of the Haramayn was an indispensable condition for any caliph.
According to The Times, Mehmed VI, the last Ottoman sultan and penultimate Ottoman caliph, sent a telegraph of support to Hussein after he had proclaimed himself caliph. Nevertheless, King Hussein’s caliphate failed to receive wide recognition from the still-colonial Arab world and it was ended when the Hashemite family had to flee the Hejaz region after its capture by the Najdi Ikhwan forces of Ibn Saud (the founder of today’s Saudi Arabia) in 1924–1925.
Mehmed VI, the last Ottoman Sultan and penultimate Ottoman Caliph, sent a telegraph of support to Ḥusayn bin ‘Alī al-Hashimi after he had proclaimed himself Caliph. But Europe did not want a Islamic Caliphate in Union and peace with a refuge homeland for the Jewish people The Saud’s are not right-full rulers of Mecca.
Can you see how Europe played games and tricked us, and is still playing games and tricking us today?
That was the main threat:
Article VII
The Zionist Organization proposes to send to Palestine a Commission of experts to make a survey of the economic possibilities of the country, and to report upon the best means for its development. The Zionist Organization will place the aforementioned Commission at the disposal of the Arab State for the purpose of a survey of the economic possibilities of the Arab State and to report upon the best means for its development. The Zionist Organization will use its best efforts to assist the Arab State in providing the means for developing the natural resources and economic possibilities thereof.
They can’t permit themselves to have a Union in the Middle East, which is a very strategic and rich location.
It costs both sides dearly (Arabs and Jews), look at all the people dying in Syria, Iraq, Egypt,… today. If Europe would not interfere since 1920 we would already have had peace for 95 years. There would not have been a Holocaust neither. But a strong and rich and advanced and peaceful Middle East before Europe even knew what peace was.(1920)
A Washington Institute for Near East Policy poll showed that the Islamic State has more support in Europe than it does in the Middle East. The poll reported that only 3 percent of Egyptians, 5 percent of Saudis, and under 1 percent of Lebanese “expressed a positive opinion of the IS.” On the other hand, 7 percent of U.K. respondents had a favorable view of the group, as did 16 percent of French polled—with 27 percent of French citizens between 18-24 responding favorably.
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/10/16/islamic-state-arab-nations-britain-support_n_5995548.html
Current Islam is a different religion than Islam was until 100 years ago. The reason is that the western anti-Semites have changed the leaders of Islam. Modern anti-Semitism started with the destruction of Judea and the deportation of the Judeans (Jews) by the Roman Empire in the first century. Today’s anti-Semitism is still the same it does not come from the Arabs but from the West (Roman Empire). The anti-Semitism that comes from the Arabs is recent and has been created by the colonial powers (ex-Roman Empire). When people attacking Islam, when true Islam is not the problem, people are not attacking the issue but actually are willing or not fuelling the anti-Semitic propaganda in the Muslim world, because by telling Muslims that they are bad because their Quran says “to kill the Jews where you find them”, you are helping Muslims believe the big-lie.
The reason they started to believe in lies from anti-Semites and the result is described in the Quran itself:Ongoing hostilities against Israel may lead to the War of Gog and Magog, of which the Qur’an says:
“There is a ban upon a city (Jerusalem) that We have destroyed; they (the Jews) shall not return till when Gog and Magog are unloosed, and they slide down out of every slope, and nigh has drawn the true promise, and behold, the eyes of the unbelievers staring: ‘Alas for us! We were heedless of this; nay, we were evildoers’”.Qur’an, Sura Anbiyaa (“The Prophets”), 21:96-98 (Arberry translation, page 331) (standard numbering: 21:95-97)
Who or what prompts you to enlist in the hordes of Gog and Magog?In this context the Qur’an warns:
“Upon the day when their faces are turned about in the Fire they shall say, ‘Ah, would we had obeyed God and the Messenger!’ They shall say, ‘Our Lord, we obeyed our chiefs and great ones, and they led us astray from the way. Our Lord, give them chastisement twofold, and curse them with a mighty curse”.Qur’an, Sura Ahzab (“The Confederates”), 33:66 (Arberry translation, page 435) (standard numbering: 33:66-68)
The next verse admonishes:
“O believers, be not as those who hurt Moses, but God declared him quit of what they said, and he was high honored with God”. Qur’an, Sura Ahzab (“The Confederates”), 33:67 (Arberry translation, page 435) (standard numbering: 33:69)
A Hadith now often quoted in anti-Jewish context, has stones and trees saying: “O Muslim, there is a Jew behind me, come and slay him” [Proceedings from the Fourth Conference, page 122]. This is a sad prediction of what is happening now. Are Muslims supposed to take the words of stones and trees for commandments instead of the Word of Allah? Transforming their own hearts into stones?
The Qur’an says Muslims must not harm Jews:
“Dispute not with the People of the Book, save in a fairer manner, except for those of them that go wrong; and say: ‘We believe in what has been sent down to us, and what has been sent down to you, our God and your God are One, and to Him we have surrendered” [Qur’an, “The Spider”, chapter 29:45].
“Have you considered? If it be from God, and you disbelieve in it, and a witness from among the Children of Israel bears witness to its like, and believes, and you wax proud — God guides not the people of the evildoers” [Qur’an, “Sand Dunes”, chapter 46:8,9].
After Britain and France back stabbed the Arabs in WW1 the man they helped take control of Islam, by removing the authentic Islamic/Arab authority, joined Hitler during WW2 against the British French and Jews, and the nazi propaganda impacts Islam until this day. (while watching it please remember that with the Muslim Authorithy before him we had an agreement for a Homeland refuge for the Jews)
The Big Lie
By the time Nazism arose in Germany in the 1930s, anti-Semitism was nothing new — not by a long shot. The Jewish people had suffered a long history of prejudice and persecution. And although Nazis perpetuated centuries-old lies, this time those lies would have their most devastating effects. Like never before, anti-Semitism was manifested in a sweeping national policy known as “the Final Solution,” which sought to eliminate Jews from the face of the Earth.To accomplish this, Adolf Hitler and his minister of propaganda, Joseph Goebbels, launched a massive campaign to convince the German people that the Jews were their enemies. Having taken over the press, they spread lies blaming Jews for all of Germany’s problems, including the loss of World War I. One outrageous lie dating back to the Middle Ages claimed that Jews engaged in the ritual killings of Christian children and used their blood in the unleavened bread eaten at Passover.Using Jews as the scapegoat, Hitler and his cronies orchestrated what they called “the big lie.” This theory states that no matter how big the lie is (or more precisely, because it’s so big), people will believe it if you repeat it enough. Everyone tells small lies, Hitler reasoned, but few have the guts to tell colossal lies. Because a big lie is so unlikely, people will come to accept it.This theory helps us understand so many of the lies throughout history. Although we’ve barely scratched the surface of all those lies.
The Nazi Arabic-language broadcasts were the result of a collaboration between officials in the German foreign ministry and pro-Nazi Arab exiles who found refuge from the British in Berlin, most notably Haj Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem and the most important Palestinian religious and political figure of the era, and Rashid Ali al-Kilani, leader of a pro-Axis coup in Iraq in 1941, which was quickly reversed by the British military. Husseini’s and Kilani’s arrival in Berlin in 1941 provided the Axis with a rare asset: Arabs who could communicate Nazi ideas in colloquial, fluent, and passionate Arabic. Previously, the Arabic broadcasts drew on the expertise of German Orientalists and the local knowledge of German diplomats who had served in the Middle East.Those early broadcasts tended to present the Third Reich as an ally of both Arab nationalists and Muslim fundamentalists. Speeches by Hitler or Joseph Goebbels, his propaganda minister, were generally omitted. Instead, the programs combined commentary on political events in the Middle East with a selective appropriation and interpretation of the Koran. The broadcasts began with an incantation—”Oh Muslims”—and a call for listeners to return to the words of the Koran. During the winter of 1940-41, several broadcasts described Muslims as “backward” because they had “not shown God the proper piety and do not fear him.” A return to traditional Islam, the broadcasts suggested, would lead to victory over Islam’s enemies.This appeal is indicative of the reactionary modernist character of Nazi propaganda, which combined modern technology with calls to reject modern liberal democratic values and institutions. The early Arabic-language broadcasts created the perception of affinity between Nazi ideology and the Koran.
The Jewish refugees from Arab Lands that started after the Nazi-propaganda
Islamic Anti-Semitic Propaganda = National Socialism 2.0
Here is a documentary on Antisemitism (5 parts) about what they do and what it is.
Jew Bashing – Anti-Semitism Europe
Jew Bashing – Anti-Semitism In US
Jew Bashing – Anti-Semitism Canada
Jew Bashing – Anti-Semitism Middle East
Here is another documentary about anti-Semitism the long hatred of the Jewish people.
The Longest Hatred (1991): 1. From the Cross to the Swastika
The Longest Hatred (1991): 2. Enemies of the Nation
The Longest Hatred (1991): 3. Between Moses & Muhammad
3 documentaries about the forgotten Holocaust, the same pagan Roman Empire, created modern anti-Semitism and created the conflict in the Middle East today
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTGpyHhunFo
BBC Ancient Rome The Rise and Fall of an Empire Episode 3 Rebellion
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftizkOoNBkA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftizkOoNBkA
The Jewish uprising against the Romans at Masada
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8e0VjsLZjE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8e0VjsLZjE
To understand what a Jew is and our History:
THE STORY OF THE JEWS
Episode One: In the Beginning
http://video.pbs.org/viralplayer/2365201859
Episode Two: Among Believers
http://video.pbs.org/viralplayer/2365201831
Episode Three: A Leap of Faith
http://video.pbs.org/viralplayer/2365201817
Episode Four: Over the Rainbow
http://video.pbs.org/viralplayer/2365201779
Here is another series from 1984 till 1998 they worked on making it, it speaks more in depth(we have a very long history), I am sure you will learn much:
Heritage: Civilization and the Jews (1984) — 1. A People is Born
Heritage: Civilization and the Jews (1984) — 2. The Power of the Word
Heritage: Civilization and the Jews (1984) — 3. The Shaping of Traditions
Heritage: Civilization and the Jews (1984) — 4. The Crucible of Europe
Heritage: Civilization and the Jews (1984) — 5. The Search for Deliverance
Heritage: Civilization and the Jews (1984) — 6. Roads from the Ghetto
Heritage: Civilization and the Jews (1984) — 7. The Golden Land
Heritage: Civilization and the Jews (1984) — 8. Out of the Ashes
Heritage: Civilization and the Jews (1984 / 1998) — 9. Into the Future
To get the right image you better hear from different sources and different angles so here is another series:
History of the Jews 1 Exodus
History of the Jews 2 Diaspora
History of the Jews 3 Stigma
History of the Jews 4 The Star Of David
History of the Jews 5 Zion

More about the things the Roman pagan Empire did in the time of the forgotten Holocaust
Originally Jesus was a Jew:
Years later the pagan Romans stole Jesuses identity and persecuted real Christians, many rejected that pagan version of Jesus and remained Jewish:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmcNuBhUEvI
Do you know Constantine adopted the name Flavian?
Full name: Flavius Valerius Aurelius Constantinus Augustus
Do you know antisemites still follow the Flavian Emperors that persecuted early Christians and Jews?
The same Flavians who exiled early Jews and Christians and killed most of them?
Do you know that these same Flavians changed the name of Israel to Palestine?
People should understand its these pagan Flavians anti-Zionists  follow today.
The Book of Revelations used by many antisemites is actually against the Pagan Roman Empire, it actually speaks about Pompeii and Vesuvius
http://player.vimeo.com/video/74484839
Over the years, a European created conflict between Jews and Arabs has been also framed as a religious war in which leaders from Haj Amin Al Husseini to Yasser Arafat to Hassan Nasrallah to Osama bin Laden have appealed to the authority of the Quran to support their goal of eliminating the State of Israel. The authority of the Quran has also been cited in support of a revisionist history that seeks to deny the historical connection of the Jewish people to the city of Jerusalem and to its holiest sites, including the Temple Mount. Western reporters have tended to ignore archeological and historical evidence and give equal weight to the supposedly competing religious narratives of Jews and Muslims: Jews are said to believe that there was a Jewish temple in Jerusalem, while the Quran states that the historical and religious claims of the Jews are false.The creation of a political conflict over land and a religious war is one of the most dangerous and frightening goals of radical “Islamist” (European puppet) politicians—but it has nothing to do with the Quran.
1. Jewish sovereignty in JerusalemIn August 2002, the Yasser Arafat-appointed “mufti of Jerusalem and the Holy Land,” Ikrima Sabri, told the Western media that “there is not even the smallest indication of the existence of a Jewish temple in Jerusalem in the past. In the whole city, there is not even a single stone indicating Jewish history.” By saying this, he confirmed what Arafat had already said to the London-based Arabic paper al-Hayat and reportedly repeated to Bill Clinton and Ehud Barak at Camp David: “Archaeologists have not found a single stone proving that the Temple of Solomon was there because historically the Temple was not in Palestine.”In making such statements, Sabri and Arafat not only blatantly denied history, archeology, and the teachings of the Bible, but they also denied the words of the Quran. From the time of the Revelation of the Noble Quran until recently, all Muslims unanimously accepted that the Haram as-Sharif, or Holy Esplanade, on which the Dome of the Rock today stands is the same place where Solomon’s and Zorobabel’s Temples once stood. As a matter of fact, Haram as-Sharif, the Sacred Area of Temple Mount, includes a place called Solomon’s Standpoint, or Maqam Sulayman—according to the Muslim tradition, Solomon used to sit there and supplicate while Hiram’s masons were engaged in building the Temple. From that same place the Muslim tradition says that Solomon prayed to dedicate the House once it was completed and to intercede for those who will approach it for worshipping.Accepting that Solomon’s Temple was in Jerusalem is compulsory for every Muslim believer, because that is what the Quran and the Islamic oral tradition, called the Sunnah, teach.In the Quran, Surah Bani Isra’il (the Chapter of the Children of Israel), verses 1-7, we find a description of Solomon’s Temple and of how it was destroyed twice by the enemies of the Jewish people:Glory to Him Who caused His servant [Muhammad] to travel by night from Masjid al-Haram [in Mecca] to Masjid al-Aqsa [in Jerusalem] whose precincts We did bless, in order that We might show him some of Our Signs: for He is the One Who heareth and seeth everything. We gave Moses the Book [Torah], and made it a Guide to the Children of Israel, commanding: ‘Take not other than Me as Disposer of your affairs.’ O ye that are the offspring of those whom We carried [in the Ark] with Noah, verily he was a devotee most grateful. And We warned the Children of Israel in the Book, that twice would they do mischief on the earth and twice be elated with mighty arrogance. When the first of the warnings came to pass, We sent against you Our creatures [Babylonians], given to terrible warfare: they entered the very inmost parts of your homes, and thus the first warning was fulfilled. Then We did grant you the return as against them; We gave you increase in resources and sons and made you abundant in human power. If ye did well, ye did well for yourselves; if ye did evil, [ye did it] against yourselves. So when the second of the warnings came to pass, [We permitted your enemies] to disfigure your faces, and to enter your Temple as they entered it once before, and to bring to destruction all that fell into their power.Imam Abu Abdullah al-Qurtubi, who lived from 1214 to 1273 and was one of the most authoritative medieval Quranic annotators, in his Al-Jami’ li Ahkam il-Qur’an, or Encyclopedia of Quranic Rules, explains the context (asbab) of the verses by mentioning among other sources the authentic Prophetic tradition (hadith). He wrote:Hudhayfah Ibn al-Yaman asked the Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him:‘I travelled more than once to Jerusalem, but saw no Temple standing there. What is the reason?’The Prophet Muhammad replied:‘Verily Solomon son of David raised Bayt al-Maqdis [i.e., Beth ha-Mikdash, the First Temple] with gold and silver, with rubies and emeralds, and Allah caused human beings and spirits to work under his command, until the raising of the House was completed. Afterwards a Babylonian King destroyed Bayt al-Maqdis and brought its treasures to the land of Babylonia, until a King of Persia defeated him and ransomed the Children of Israel. They rebuilt Bayt al-Maqdis for the second time [the Second Temple], until it was destroyed for the second time by an army led by a Roman Emperor.’One can easily verify that Jewish and Muslim traditional sources are confirming each other: The Temple was built by Solomon and destroyed by a Babylonian king. A Persian king later defeated the Babylonians and ransomed the Jews, permitting them to return to the Land of Israel. The Temple was rebuilt but afterward was destroyed by the Romans. This Temple stood in the area referred to as Beth haMikdash in Hebrew and Bayt al-Maqdis in Arabic. Those political and pseudo-religious Palestinian leaders who claim that “there was never a Jewish Temple in Jerusalem” are surely aware that, in order to support their political claims, they are compelled to lie, hide sources, and contradict the letter of the Quran and the Islamic tradition.
An earlier Quranic exegete and jurist, Imam Muhammad ibn Jarir at-Tabari, who lived from 838 to 923, writes in his Tarikh al-Rusul wa al-Muluk, or History of Prophets and Kings, that the same sacred area was the place where Jacob had his vision of the Heavenly Ladder:When Jacob awoke he felt blissful from what he had seen in his trustful dream and vowed, for God’s sake that, if he returned to his family safely, he would build there a Temple for the Almighty. He also vowed to perpetual charity one tenth of his property for the sake of God. He poured oil on the Stone so as to recognize it and called the place Bayt El, which means ‘the House of God.’ It became the location of Jerusalem later.In Jerusalem on a huge Rock, Solomon son of David built a beautiful Temple to expand the worship of God. Today on the base of that Temple stands the Dome of the Rock.Historical negation of Jewish and Islamic sources concerning Jerusalem is recent and does not predate the PLO and its political propaganda. In 1932, during the British Mandate period, the Supreme Muslim Council of Jerusalem published a Brief Guide to Haram as-Sharif for Muslim pilgrims, written in English. “This site is one of the oldest in the world,” it says. “Its sanctity dates from the earliest times. Its identity with the site of Solomon’s Temple is beyond dispute. This, too, is the spot, according to universal belief, on which David built there an altar unto the Lord, and offered burnt offerings and peace offerings.”Not only were Arafat’s minions and heirs in Jerusalem attempting to rewrite the history of Arabs and Jews in the region as told by others; they were also attempting to rewrite the history of Arabs and Jews in the region as told by Islamic Arab sources, too.
2. Jewish sovereignty in the Land of IsraelThe Biblical notion that God granted the land of Canaan to the Children of Israel is confirmed by the Quran. In the Surah of Jonah, verse 93, we read:We settled the Children of Israel in a beautiful dwelling-place, and provided for them sustenance of the best.In Surah al-Ahraf (of the Barrier), verse 137, we read:We made a people considered weak inheritors of the Land in both Eastern and Western side [of the Jordan river] whereon we sent down Our blessings. The fair promise of thy Lord was fulfilled for the Children of Israel, because they had patience and constancy, and We levelled to the ground the great works and fine buildings which Pharaoh and his people erected.Surah al Maidah (the Table), verse 21, is the only passage in which the Holy Land is mentioned by that title (al-Ard al-Muqaddas). It refers to the words Moses spoke to the descendants of Isaac:Remember Moses said To his people: ‘O my People, call in remembrance the favor of God unto you, when He produced prophets among you, made you kings, and gave You what He had not given To any other among the peoples. O my people! Enter The Holy Land which God hath written for you, and turn not back ignominiously [to this heritage of yours], for then will ye be overthrown, to your own ruin.In a commentary of Imam Abu al-Qasim Mahmud al-Zamakshari, who lived from 1074 to 1144, titled al-Kashaf, or The Revealer, we read the following explanation:As for the borders of ‘the Holy Land,’ some scholars says its northern border is the Mount [Hermon] and its surroundings, and for others in also includes a part of the Land of Sham [the Golan]. Others say it extends from the territory of the Philistines [Gaza] until Damascus and a part of Urvum. Some say that God presented to Abraham this Land as an inheritance for his children when he went up to the mountain and said to him: ‘Look around as far as your gaze can reach. Every place reached by your eyes will be theirs.’ The Holy Temple was the dwelling place of the prophets and the residence of the believers. ‘God hath written for you’ means ‘God swore it and wrote in the Divine Tablets of Predestination: that it is yours, belongs to your people and do not turn back from it. Do not be afraid of the Philistine giants who live there.A similar note is also found in a commentary of Abdallah ibn ‘Umar al-Qadi al-Baidawi, who lived from 1226 to 1260, titled Asrar ut-Tanzil wa Asrar ut-Ta’wil, or The Secrets of Revelation and the Secrets of Interpretation.3. Jewish sovereignty in the Land of Israel was never abolishedMoreover, the Quran explicitly refers to the return of the Jews to the Land of Israel before the Last Judgment when it says in the Surah of the Children of Israel, verse 104:And thereafter We [God] said to the Children of Israel: ‘Dwell securely in the Promised Land. And when the last warning will come to pass, we will gather you together in a mingled crowd.’Therefore, from an Islamic point of view, Israel is the legitimate owner of the land God deeded to her and whose borders were defined by Abraham in Genesis.All recent claims according to which the “assignment of the Land of Israel to the Jewish people was withdrawn or abrogated” are bereft of scriptural or traditional evidence. The Quran mentions the territory that God assigned to the Jewish people, but neither it nor the traditional Islamic sources mention a supposed withdrawal.Imam al-Qurtubi explains in al-Jami that the last promise concerning the return of the Jewish people “together in a mingled crowd” after the destruction of the Second Temple will be a sign that precedes the coming of the Messiah.The Quran only mentions a double period of mischief and a double punishment with exile from the Land. God says:We warned the Children of Israel in the Book, that TWICE would they do mischief on the earth and TWICE be elated with mighty arrogance.According to this Quranic proof, the contemporary Zionist rebuilding of the State of Israel—the third entry of the Jews to their divinely appointed land—is not mischief but rather a fulfillment of what Imam az-Zamakshari reminds the Jews: “God swore it and wrote in the Divine Tablets of Predestination: that it is yours, belongs to your people and do not turn back from it.”
The Quran is Kosher and Zionist:For more see:Peace is Possible between Ishmael and Israel according to the Qur’an and the Tanach
http://www.the-lord-is-one.com/peace-possible-ishmael-israel-according-quran-tanach/

And now people even really believe the “blood libel” that says that Israel is destroying Al-Aqsa while in the meanwhile they are deaf, dumb and blind about the fact that the fake-“Muslim” authority are destroying and desecrating the Earth and remains of the temple of the Bani Israel Prohet and King Sulaymān سليمان (Solomon):

And more recently:
And because of all those lies the Israeli authority cannot do nothing because of threats of WW3, all this because of people spreading and believing the propaganda.
But Israel is so strong in media that I can barely find videos in English, another lie exposed
And yes, Israelis try to stop it, and Israeli police is afraid to stop them, so has no choice than to let them destroy and desecrate and give protection
A leading Archaeologist begs to stop the destruction:
Because of propaganda Muslims today forgot that Omar who delivered Jerusalem cleansed the place and later built the Mosque Al-Aqsa near the location of the Temple of Prophet Solomon where he built a Dome (Arabic: قبة الصخرة, translit.: Qubbat As-Sakhrah ) because:The Christians had used the area as a garbage dump to offend the Jews, and Umar and his army (along with some Jews) personally cleaned it and built a Dome Qubbat As-Sakhrah there.And he first invited the Jews to return, but the Jews were very dispersed and did not hear him, so he built the Dome Qubbat As-Sakhrah as a sign of respect to the Temple of Solomon which became a dump under the Christian antisemites.
The famous ninth century Muslim historian Al-Tabri is an important read on the topic of Muslim conquest in the region of Syria-Palestine. It was interesting to find that Caliph Umar (RA), who was busy in a military campaign at a Syrian front, advanced his armies in Jerusalem only at the request and instigation of a Jew.
Al-Tabri tells the story that when Caliph Umar arrived at the temple mount he summoned Ka’ab Ahbar, a prominent Jewish convert to Islam, to help identify “Sakhra” (the “rock” or the “foundation stone”) of Jewish traditions, upon which the world was founded. For Caliph Umar, this spot signified the first Qibla, the direction of Muslim prayers, which Prophet Mohammad used until 622 CE, when it was changed to Kabah in Makkah for eternity (Holy Quran 2:142–145). After the identification of “Sakhra,” he then asked Ka’ab where in his opinion Muslims should put their Qibla (meaning toward “Sakhra” or the “Kabah”), to which Ka’ab replied, “Toward Sakhra.” Caliph Umar, showing his resentment of this opinion, said, “We Muslims are commanded to face Kabah.” Having said that, he faced Makkah in the southern corner of the platform to offer his prayers, where later the mosque was constructed that today is called Masjid Al-Aqsa. One wonders why Caliph Umar asked a question to which he already knew the answer and especially to a former Jew and not the other senior companions of Prophet Mohammad who were also present at the occasion. Clearly, what Caliph Umar and the other companions have shown here is a unanimous reaffirmation that as Kabah had become the center of their prayers by a divine decree, the significance of “Sakhra” in Islamic jurisprudence was over and they had nothing to do with it anymore.Same counts for Salahadin.Upon the capture of Jerusalem, Saladin summoned the Jews and permitted them to resettle in the city. In particular, the residents of Ashkelon, a large Jewish settlement, responded to his request.
But propaganda has flaws, they call the wrong building Al-Aqsa, did you ever think, if really Muslims do the propaganda, why do they speak about Al-Aqsa when they show pictures of Al-Sakhrah. Because the propaganda is not really Muslim but comes from the Europeans and its puppets.
The Midrash Secrets (Nistarot) of Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai, written in the Crusader period, compares Muhammad, “a prophet sent to Ishmael according to God’s will”, to the Jewish Messiah. According to this text, ascribed to the famous 1st-century sage and mystic Simeon bar Yochai, Muhammad’s role as a prophet includes redeeming the Jews from the Christian (“Roman” or “Edomite”) oppression and playing a positive role in the messianic process.
Great Rabbi Maimonides (RAMBAM), In his authoritative work of law (Hilkhot Melakhim 11:10–12), indicated that Muhammad was part of God’s plan of preparing the world for the coming of the Jewish Messiah: “All those words of Jesus of Nazareth and of this Ishmaelite [i.e., Muhammad] who arose after him are only to make straight the path for the messianic king and to prepare the whole world to serve the Lord together. As it is said: ‘For then I will change the speech of the peoples to a pure speech so that all of them shall call on the name of the Lord and serve him with one accord’ (Zephaniah 3:9)
Here is the reason Israel has won all the wars against all the European puppet Arab Nations united (there are even more verses)
يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ حَرِّضِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ عَلَى الْقِتَالِ ۚ إِن يَكُن مِّنكُمْ عِشْرُونَ صَابِرُونَ يَغْلِبُوا مِائَتَيْنِ ۚ وَإِن يَكُن مِّنكُم مِّائَةٌ يَغْلِبُوا أَلْفًا مِّنَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا بِأَنَّهُمْ قَوْمٌ لَّا يَفْقَهُونَ
“O Prophet! rouse the Believers to the fight. If there are twenty amongst you, patient and persevering, they will vanquish two hundred: if a hundred, they will vanquish a thousand of the Unbelievers: for these are a people without understanding.”. – Qur’an, Sura al-Anfal (“The Spoils of War”), 8:65
Because according to the Quran Jews are Muslims but have to follow the Laws of Moses (Torah) and Prophets (Neviim, Ketuvim)
“I believe that there is no god but He in whom the Children of Israel believe; I am of those that surrender”. – Qur’an, Sura Yunus (“Jonah”),: 10:90
“They would not follow thy direction of prayer; nor art thou going to follow their direction of prayer; nor indeed will they follow each other’s direction of prayer”. – Qur’an, Sura al-Baqarah (“The Heifer”), 2:145
“God is our Lord and your Lord. We have our deeds, and you have your deeds; there is no argument between us and you; God shall bring us together, and unto Him is the homecoming”. – Qur’an, Sura Shura (“Consultation”), 42:15
“And We gave Moses the Book, that haply they would be guided”. – Qur’an, Sura al-Mu’minun (“The Believers”), 23:49
“And We gave Moses the Book, and made it a guidance to the Children of Israel”. – Qur’an, Sura al-Isra (“The Night Journey”) Bani Isra’il (“Children of Israel”), 17:3
“Yet before it was the Book of Moses for a model and a mercy; and this is a Book confirming, in Arabic tongue, to warn the evildoers, and good tidings to the good-doers”. – Qur’an, Sura al-Ahqaf (“The Sand-Dunes”), 46:12
“Indeed, We gave Moses the Book; so be not in doubt concerning the encounter with him; and We appointed it for a guidance to the Children of Israel”. – Qur’an, Sura al-Sajdah (“Prostration”), 32:23
“Surely, We sent down the Torah, wherein is guidance and light; thereby, the Prophets who had surrendered themselves gave judgment for those of Jewry, as did the masters and the rabbis, following such portion of God’s Book as they were given to keep and were witnesses to”. Qur’an, Sura al-Ma’idah (“The Table”), 5:44
“O believers, be not as those who hurt Moses, but God declared him quit of what they said, and he was high honored with God”. Qur’an, Sura al-Ahzab (“The Confederates”), 33:69
“We gave the Children of Israel the Book, the Judgment, and the Prophethood, and We provided them with good things, and We preferred them above all beings”. Qur’an, Sura al-Jathiyah (“Hobbling”), 45:16
“And when We took compact with you, and raised above you the Mount: ‘Take forcefully what We have given you, and remember what is in it; haply you shall be godfearing’”. – Qur’an, Sura al-Baqarah (“The Heifer”), 2:63
“And We brought the Children of Israel over the sea (10:90); And We settled the Children of Israel in a sure settlement, and We provided them with good things” (10:93). Qur’an, Sura Yunus (“Jonah”), 10:90, 10:93
“Then their Prophet said to them, ‘Verily God has raised up Saul for you as king’. They said, ‘How should he be king over us who have better right than he to kingship, seeing he has not been given amplitude of wealth?’ He said, ‘God has chosen him over you, and has increased him broadly in knowledge and body. God gives the kingship to whom He will; and God is All-embracing, All-knowing’”. – Qur’an, Sura al-Baqarah (“The Heifer”), 2:247
“And when We took compact with you, and raised above you the Mount: ‘Take forcefully what We have given you, and remember what is in it; haply you shall be godfearing’”. – Qur’an, Sura al-Baqarah (“The Heifer”), 2:63
“Hast thou not regarded the Council of the Children of Israel, after Moses, when they said to a Prophet of theirs, ‘Raise up for us a king, and we will fight in God’s way’. He said, ‘Might it be that, if fighting is prescribed for you, you will not fight?’ They said, ‘Why should we not fight in God’s way, who have been expelled from our habitations and our children?’ Yet when fighting was prescribed for them, they turned their backs except for a few of them; and God has knowledge of the evildoers”. – Qur’an, Sura al-Baqarah (“The Heifer”), 2:246
“But why do they come to thee for decision, when they have (their own) law before them?- therein is the (plain) command of Allah; yet even after that, they would turn away. For they are not (really) People of Faith.It was We who revealed the law (to Moses): therein was guidance and light. By its standard have been judged the Jews, by the prophets who bowed (as in Islam) to Allah’s will, by the rabbis and the doctors of law: for to them was entrusted the protection of Allah’s book, and they were witnesses thereto: therefore fear not men, but fear me, and sell not my signs for a miserable price. If any do fail to judge by (the light of) what Allah hath revealed, they are (no better than) Unbelievers.—Quran, sura 5 (Al-Ma’ida), ayat 43-44
“We sent not any before thee, except men to whom We revealed: ‘Question the people of the Remembrance, if it should be that you do not know’ – with the clear signs, and the Psalms; and We have sent down to thee the Remembrance that thou mayest make clear to mankind what was sent down to them; and so haply they will reflect”.- Qur’an, Sura al-Nahl (“The Bee”), 16:43-44
The Muslim leaders today don’t listen the word of Allah they are not Muslims but puppets of the European anti-Semites
“And when Moses said to his people: ‘O My People, remember God’s blessing upon you, when He appointed among you Prophets, and appointed you kings, and gave you such as He had not given to any being. O My People, enter the Holy Land which God has PRESCRIBED for you, and turn not back in your traces, to turn about losers’”.Qur’an, Sura al-Ma’idah (“The Table”), 5:20-21
[ya qawmi udkhulu’l-ar d al-muqaddasa allati kataba’llah lakum wa la tartadu ‘ ala ‘adbarikum fatanqalibu khasirina.] – Surat al-Ma ‘ida (Qur’an 5:21)kataba’llah lakum , this is a commandment for the children of Israel.
“Children of Israel, remember My blessing wherewith I blessed you, and that I have preferred you above all beings”.Qur’an, Sura al-Baqarah (“The Heifer”), 2:47
The Qur’an speaks of Israel’s return to the Land of Israel, and to Jerusalem
“We sent against you Our servants to discountenance you, and to enter the Temple, as they entered it the first time, and to destroy utterly that which they ascended to. Perchance your Lord will have mercy upon you; but if you return, We shall return; and We have made Gehenna a prison for the unbelievers”. – Qur’an, Sura al-Isra (“The Night Journey”) – Bani Isra’il (“Children of Israel”), 17:7-8
“He desired to startle them from the Land; and We drowned him and those with him, all together. And We said to the Children of Israel after him, ‘Dwell in the Land; and when the promise of the world to come comes to pass, We shall gather you together in a mingled crowd’”. – Qur’an, Sura al-Isra (“The Night Journey”) – Bani Isra’il (“Children of Israel”), 17:103-104
Israel is often harshly rebuked in the Qur’an, but there is no cancellation of God’s covenants with and promises to Israel. On the contrary, the words of the prophets shall surely be established
“The promise of God! God fails not His promise, but most men do not know it”. – Qur’an, Sura al-Rum (“The Greeks”), 30:6
“So be thou patient; surely God’s promise is true”. – Qur’an, Sura al-Mu’minum (“The Believers”), 40:77
“it was said, ‘God’s promise is true, and the Hour, there is no doubt of it’”. – Qur’an, Sura al-Jathiyah (“Hobbling”), 45:32
“They will question thee concerning the Hour, when it shall berth. Say: ‘The knowledge of it is only with my Lord; none shall reveal it at its proper time, but He’”. – Qur’an, Sura A’raf (“The Battlements”), 7:187
‘Nay, but they cry lies to the Hour; and We have prepared for him who cries lies to the Hour a blaze. When it sees them from a far place, they shall hear its bubbling and sighing. And when they are cast, coupled in fetters, into a narrow place of that Fire, they will call out there for destruction. ‘Call not out today for one destruction, but call for many!’ Say: ‘Is it better, or the Garden of Eternity, that is promised to the godfearing, and is their recompense and homecoming?’” – Qur’an, Sura Furqan (“Salvation”), 25:11-15
“There is a ban upon a city that We have destroyed; they shall not return till when Gog and Magog are unloosed, and they slide down out of every slope, and nigh has drawn the true promise, and behold, the eyes of the unbelievers staring: ‘Alas for us! We were heedless of this; nay, we were evildoers’”. – Qur’an, Sura Anbiyaa (“The Prophets”), 21:95-97
“Upon the day when their faces are turned about in the Fire they shall say, ‘Ah, would we had obeyed God and the Messenger!’ They shall say, ‘Our Lord, we obeyed our chiefs and great ones, and they led us astray from the way. Our Lord, give them chastisement twofold, and curse them with a mighty curse”. – Qur’an, Sura Ahzab (“The Confederates”), 33:66-68)
The next verse admonishes:
“O believers, be not as those who hurt Moses, but God declared him quit of what they said, and he was high honored with God”. – Qur’an, Sura al-Ahzab (“The Confederates”), 33:69
“Remember Abraham said: “O my Lord! make this city one of peace and security: and preserve me and my sons ( Yishmael and Isaac) from worshipping idols.”” ( سورة إبراهيم , Ibrahim, Chapter #14, Verse #35)
Arafat and his friends are not Muslims but puppets of the Pagan Romans(Europe/West) this is why Arafat issued a stamp in honor of the false-god Baal and that he said Palestinians are Canaanites.
Baal is an idol and a false god that is written about and against in the Quran (as-Saffat 37: 125-126) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postage_stamps_and_postal_history_of_Palestine
Themes chosen for PNA stamps include: two series of Palestinian costumes (1997, 2002), local plants (1996), birds, photographs of 19th century Gaza and Hebron, the Canaanite god Baal, Byzantium era mosaics, butterflies, horses, tales of the Arabian nights, the airship LZ 127 Graf Zeppelin, cacti (2003), Palestinian universities, folk art (2003). Along its nature themes, stamps were issued with the World Wildlife Fund (2001).
Quran (as-Saffat 37: 125-126)
119 And We left (this blessing) for them among generations (to come) in later times:
120 “Peace and salutation to Moses and Aaron!”
121 Thus indeed do We reward those who do right.
122 For they were two of our believing Servants.
123 So also was Elias among those sent (by Us).
124 Behold, he said to his people, “Will ye not fear (Allah)?
125 “Will ye call upon Baal and forsake the Best of Creators,-
126 “Allah, your Lord and Cherisher and the Lord and Cherisher of your fathers of old?”
127 But they rejected him, and they will certainly be called up (for punishment),-
128 Except the sincere and devoted Servants of Allah (among them).
129 And We left (this blessing) for him among generations (to come) in later times:
130 “Peace and salutation to such as Elias!”
131 Thus indeed do We reward those who do right.
132 For he was one of our believing Servants.

PAblk9


12345678